Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	16.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4100 6,492 User benchmarks, average bench 33% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	31.3% Below average	Memory 40.8 1-Core 41.3 2-Core 76.3 32% 52.8 Pts	4-Core 127 8-Core 129 17% 128 Pts	64-Core 130 8% 130 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7324 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.78% Terrible	Lighting 1.87 Reflection 2.54 Parallax 2.03 2% 2.15 fps	MRender 2.62 Gravity 2.07 Splatting 3.43 2% 2.71 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.78% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kodilx SSD 128GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: E8FM12.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 52 36 45 33 44 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	16.5% Very poor	Read 39.2 Write 66 Mixed 56.2 SusWrite 48.1 12% 52.4 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 28.6 4K Mixed 8.5 34% 14.1 MB/s	DQ Read 24.6 DQ Write 52.2 DQ Mixed 27.6 24% 34.8 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston CBD24D4S7S8K1A-8 1x8GB 73 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	19.7% Very poor	MC Read 7.2 MC Write 7.7 MC Mixed 7.2 21% 7.37 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 3.2 10% 3.37 GB/s	Latency 199 20% 199 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4100IntelBench 33%, 6,492 samples	4x
Celeron N4120IntelBench 33%, 2,420 samples	2x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	6x

SSD
SSD 128GBKodilxBench 44%, 9 samples	4x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	1x
PC SN520 SDAPMUW-256G-1101 256GBWDCBench 143%, 6,320 samples	1x

RAM
CBD24D4S7S8K1A-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 73 samples	4x
KMKYF9-MID KMKYF9-MIB 16GBKingstonBench 54%, 13 samples	1x
CT8G4SFS824A.C8FJ Kingston CBD24D4S7S8K1A-8 16GBCrucialBench 21%, 1 sample	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16