Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	8.72% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	52.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U2E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	72.7% Very good	Memory 93.4 1-Core 85 2-Core 163 69% 114 Pts	4-Core 290 8-Core 369 42% 330 Pts	64-Core 370 23% 370 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Mobility Radeon HD 5850 1,228 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Apple(106B 00CC) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	8.72% Terrible	Lighting 11.6 Reflection 8.54 Parallax 9.62 9% 9.91 fps	MRender 8.1 Gravity 8.4 Splatting 10 7% 8.83 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.72% Great: 9%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 362GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 221 202 203 192 206 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	52.4% Above average	Read 240 Write 229 Mixed 219 SusWrite 208 50% 224 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 35 4K Mixed 19.3 69% 23.8 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 192 145% 195 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12GB 85,415 User benchmarks, average bench 35% null MHz 2048, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	36% Below average	MC Read 12.8 MC Write 11.7 MC Mixed 9.9 33% 11.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 11.8 SC Mixed 10.7 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 61.2 65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 5730AMDBench 4%, 2,535 samples	20x
Mobility Radeon HD 5850AMDBench 7%, 1,228 samples	16x
HD 5750AMDBench 8%, 12,403 samples	6x

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $147

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16