Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6500U 102,213 User benchmarks, average bench 46% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	Memory 70.2 1-Core 74.2 2-Core 132 55% 92 Pts	4-Core 260 8-Core 249 34% 255 Pts	64-Core 243 15% 243 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 M360 136 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Legend(17AA 5049) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.11.5 Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	4.55% Terrible	Lighting 5.6 Reflection 9.69 Parallax 7.44 5% 7.58 fps	MRender 4.14 Gravity 5.6 Splatting 6.35 4% 5.36 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.55% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LF192HCGS-000L1 192GB 1,857 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXT03L1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 745 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1146 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 20 (AE) Unknown 99 99 48 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1591 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 67 53 33 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 2 (E9) Unknown 99 99 16609442 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2484 (F2) Unknown 99 99 3389 (F9) Unknown 99 99 3840	42.5% Average	Read 450 Write 47.9 Mixed 96.2 42% 198 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 32.9 4K Mixed 10.8 60% 20.9 MB/s	DQ Read 154 DQ Write 25.3 DQ Mixed 19.9 32% 66.5 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GB 39,427 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	29.3% Poor	MC Read 10.9 MC Write 10.9 MC Mixed 9.4 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 5.4 17% 6.07 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16