Lenovo 20EV003EUK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20EV003EUK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20EV003EUK
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191031
Uptime11.3 Days
Run DateMay 27 '20 at 20:25
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 80.4
1-Core 93.7
2-Core 171
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 249
33% 248 Pts
64-Core 243
15% 243 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 M370
Legend(17AA 5049) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 26.20.15019.19000
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
4.01% Terrible
Lighting 4.93
Reflection 9.54
Parallax 9.53
4% 8 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 6.43
Splatting 0.13
4% 5.62 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 4.01%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TY256HDHP-000L7 500GB
327GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 293 267 284 298 301 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 395
Write 350
Mixed 195
SusWrite 290
69% 307 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 30.4
96% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 198
180% 276 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMSO8GX3M1C1600C11 Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
57.2% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 19.2
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 15.6
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20EV003EUK Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20EV003EUK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback