HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results


Gaming 73% Battleship	Desktop 100% UFO	Workstation 69% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	69.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

System	HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 84FD
Memory	9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191119
Uptime	4.9 Days
Run Date	May 28 '20 at 15:27
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700-$260 79,875 User benchmarks, average bench 92% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Memory 92 1-Core 145 2-Core 290 96% 176 Pts	4-Core 579 8-Core 1053 98% 816 Pts	64-Core 1,040 64% 1,040 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 99%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$233 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% HP(103C 8789) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	69.3% Good	Lighting 86.8 Reflection 79.4 Parallax 72.9 71% 79.7 fps	MRender 110 Gravity 71.8 Splatting 68.5 66% 83.4 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GB 20,171 User benchmarks, average bench 174% 110GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXD70H1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 484 330 326 327 307 293 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	207% Outstanding	Read 1674 Write 1,482 Mixed 1,082 SusWrite 345 255% 1,146 MB/s	4K Read 52.6 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 70 227% 77.1 MB/s	DQ Read 979 DQ Write 1,173 DQ Mixed 1,042 795% 1,064 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 207% Great: 235%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 (TurboPC EX) 2TB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX4OAC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 182 182 183 183 183 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 178 Write 173 Mixed 40 SusWrite 182 104% 143 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP26D4U9S8ME-8X 2x8GB 4,094 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	78% Very good	MC Read 31.3 MC Write 27.8 MC Mixed 23.9 79% 27.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.2 SC Write 27.1 SC Mixed 25.1 66% 23.1 GB/s	Latency 64.2 62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 6,054 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 67%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 60%

Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	2,373x
Core i7-9700Intel $260Bench 92%, 79,875 samples	2,004x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	707x

GPU
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	1,322x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	829x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	709x

SSD
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	1,393x
hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBSKBench 123%, 30,266 samples	1,223x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1006 256GBWDCBench 152%, 17,295 samples	291x

RAM
HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 1x16GBKingstonBench 46%, 8,406 samples	1,890x
HP26D4U6D8ME-16X 1x16GBKingstonBench 47%, 4,169 samples	777x
HP26D4U9S8ME-8X 2x8GBKingstonBench 79%, 4,094 samples	451x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 108% - Outstanding

Total price: $343

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16