Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	77.7% Very good	Memory 88.4 1-Core 105 2-Core 206 77% 133 Pts	4-Core 366 8-Core 501 55% 433 Pts	64-Core 465 29% 465 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA 2454) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.9% Below average	Lighting 39.7 Reflection 31.8 Parallax 37.9 32% 36.5 fps	MRender 37.7 Gravity 39.1 Splatting 37.4 31% 38.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$140 14,258 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: LE1i SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 167 158 156 151 159 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	39.5% Below average	Read 354 Write 208 Mixed 233 SusWrite 152 53% 237 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 6.4 4K Mixed 8.5 56% 14.1 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 12GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	43.9% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 12.7 41% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 15.9 SC Mixed 13.9 41% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 69.2 58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	2,186x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	983x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	933x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	226x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	158x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 4x4GBMicronBench 56%, 6,584 samples	152x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16