Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U 78,189 User benchmarks, average bench 48% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	36.8% Below average	Memory 31.7 1-Core 61.7 2-Core 126 39% 73.2 Pts	4-Core 224 8-Core 385 37% 304 Pts	64-Core 388 24% 388 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics 115,953 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 111F) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.41.28 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	2.32% Terrible	Lighting 2.73 Reflection 2.96 Parallax 3.59 2% 3.1 fps	MRender 2.95 Gravity 2.6 Splatting 3.48 2% 3.01 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 2.32% Great: 13%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W256G1102 256GB 3,311 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 175GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6106002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 207 213 213 205 204 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	65.4% Good	Read 401 Write 369 Mixed 286 SusWrite 210 71% 316 MB/s	4K Read 21.9 4K Write 41.4 4K Mixed 26.7 89% 30 MB/s	DQ Read 207 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 183 141% 192 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 2x4GB 1,337 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	25.6% Poor	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 12.2 26% 8.93 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 10.9 25% 8.9 GB/s	Latency 245 16% 245 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 69%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
Ryzen 5 3500UAMDBench 48%, 78,189 samples	34x

GPU
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	34x

SSD
SD9SN8W256G1102 256GBSandiskBench 69%, 3,311 samples	21x
RBUSNS8180DS3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 58%, 2,813 samples	12x
Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBNvme $45Bench 187%, 23,539 samples	1x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 2x4GBMicronBench 54%, 1,337 samples	22x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples	12x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16