Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics76.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive54.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte AX370-Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170619
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 30 '20 at 11:39
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 70.9
1-Core 104
2-Core 210
71% 128 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 790
72% 606 Pts
64-Core 1,142
71% 1,142 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.7% Very good
Lighting 94
Reflection 106
Parallax 89.8
77% 96.7 fps
MRender 93.4
Gravity 89.9
Splatting 96.5
77% 93.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2016)
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 121 102 90 96 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 472
Write 185
Mixed 151
SusWrite 104
50% 228 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 76.4
4K Mixed 9.8
84% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 15.8
43% 93.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 70%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
1TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 73 73 74 75 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 68
Write 77.8
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 74.2
45% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 108%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB
86GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 52 24 28 25 25 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 144
Write 65.6
Mixed 62.7
SusWrite 36.1
90% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 2.6
185% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown V02D4LF8GB5285282400 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.9% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 27.3
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 24.9
72% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 99.3
40% 99.3 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 356 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $528
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback