| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 58% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 17.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock Z370M Pro4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20171201 |
| Uptime | 5.9 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 01 '20 at 17:43 |
| Run Duration | 122 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 99% |
PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
77.5%
Very good
|
85% 153 Pts
|
54% 414 Pts
|
27% 439 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.48
|
58%
Above average
|
58% 69.1 fps
|
57% 69.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 120GB-$32
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 45 54 15 16 60 MB/s
|
17.9%
Very poor
|
52% 236 MB/s
|
0% 0.1 MB/s
| |
|
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$78
953GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 100 100 104 101 102 MB/s
|
62.5%
Good
|
73% 99 MB/s
|
186% 1.47 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$63
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
68.8%
Good
|
72% 25.2 GB/s
|
47% 16.4 GB/s
|
57% 70.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Z370M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,408 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock Z370M Pro4
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples | 269x |
| Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 219x |
| Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples | 186x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 91x |
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 84x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 81x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 89% - Excellent | Total price: $445 |