Asrock 760GM-HDV

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	12.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	69.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock 760GM-HDV (all builds)
Memory	6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20180511
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 06 '20 at 14:37
Run Duration	111 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	66.2% Good	Memory 86.2 1-Core 72.6 2-Core 144 62% 101 Pts	4-Core 250 8-Core 435 42% 343 Pts	64-Core 438 27% 438 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203 31,648 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Nvidia(10DE 083D) 1GB CLim: 650 MHz, MLim: 850 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Lighting 14 Reflection 16.3 Parallax 12.5 11% 14.3 fps	MRender 19.9 Gravity 14.1 Splatting 16.5 14% 16.8 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 14%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 351GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 213 214 217 217 217 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	69.7% Good	Read 243 Write 217 Mixed 215 SusWrite 213 50% 222 MB/s	4K Read 30.2 4K Write 71.9 4K Mixed 38.5 133% 46.9 MB/s	DQ Read 131 DQ Write 119 DQ Mixed 45.9 56% 98.8 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-14900CL9-4GBZL0 F3-14900CL9-4GBZL0 8GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 333, 333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	48.8% Average	MC Read 20.2 MC Write 15.4 MC Mixed 17.3 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 11.4 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 71.1 56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 760GM-HDV Builds (Compare 306 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 15%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 760GM-HDV

CPU
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	120x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	63x
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples	46x

GPU
Radeon RX 560-BAMDBench 20%, 49,289 samples	37x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	32x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	22x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
MZ7LN256HAJQ-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 82%, 2,092 samples	8x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	48x
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 1x8GBUnknownBench 27%, 3,584 samples	15x
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $75

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16