Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop TP401MAS_J401MA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop TP401MAS_J401MA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TP401MAS
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '20 at 02:50
Run Duration71 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Pentium Silver N5000
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
41.9% Average
Memory 46.1
1-Core 62.5
2-Core 120
44% 76.3 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 218
30% 218 Pts
64-Core 220
15% 220 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 605
Asus(1043 1231) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
1.11% Terrible
Lighting 10.7
Reflection 8.8
Parallax 8.1
3% 9.2 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 3.5
Splatting 6.7
1% 4.6 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.11%
Great: 3%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
28.4% Poor
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 11.6
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 3.8
11% 3.83 GB/s
Latency 176
23% 176 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $193Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $295Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $43
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $66SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback