TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP 23-q110na

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.37% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive68.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 23-q110na  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B44
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150901
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJul 17 '20 at 10:20
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-8700P Radeon R6, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
44.2% Average
Memory 61.9
1-Core 52.2
2-Core 89.9
43% 68 Pts
4-Core 155
8-Core 156
21% 156 Pts
64-Core 154
10% 154 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑
This bench: 44.2%
 Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
HP(103C 2B44) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1001.1001
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
5.37% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 9.15
Parallax 8.69
5% 8.11 fps
MRender 6.43
Gravity 5.47
Splatting 7.87
6% 6.59 fps
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 5.37%
 Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 159 164 160 163 165 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 295
Write 192
Mixed 225
SusWrite 163
49% 219 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 60.5
4K Mixed 37.1
122% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 189
144% 195 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑
This bench: 68.7%
 Great: 87%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 34
Write 28
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 18
20% 27.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑
This bench: 15.1%
 Great: 109%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 500GB
79GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 34.2
Write 28.2
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 18.1
20% 26.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑
This bench: 15.2%
 Great: 73%
TDKMedia Trans-It Drive 32GB
3GB free, PID 061a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 6.7 7.9 6.7 7.7 7.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
4.92% Terrible
Read 15
Write 4
Mixed 2.8
SusWrite 7.3
8% 7.27 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.5
34% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 4.92%
 Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.2% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 16.5
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 9.2
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 35.2%
 Great: 61%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 23-q110na Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP 23-q110na

CPU
A10-8700P Radeon R6, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6GAMDBench 30%, 7,922 samples7x
GPU
Radeon R6 GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 3,569 samples5x
Radeon R6 GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 3,679 samples2x
RAM
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 30,280 samples3x
8KTF51264HZ-1G9P1 2x4GBMicronBench 34%, 894 samples2x
M471B5173EB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 46%, 19,666 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback