HP OMEN Notebook PC 15

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP OMEN Notebook PC 15  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2332
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 26 '20 at 06:00
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 76.8
1-Core 105
2-Core 202
72% 128 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 533
57% 454 Pts
64-Core 518
32% 518 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 860M
HP(103C 2332) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5167
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 21
Reflection 16
Parallax 18.8
17% 18.6 fps
MRender 23.6
Gravity 13.6
Splatting 15.8
14% 17.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD6PP4M-256G-1006 256GB
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A200806
SusWrite @10s intervals: 525 556 551 362 152 106 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6MFR8A-PB 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
54.5% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 16.4
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 19.2
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN Notebook PC 15 Builds (Compare 94 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN Notebook PC 15

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback