Asus H97M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics23.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive186% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H97M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180408
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 30 '20 at 15:52
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 90.9
1-Core 120
2-Core 238
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 621
65% 521 Pts
64-Core 617
38% 617 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23.6% Poor
Lighting 26.7
Reflection 30.8
Parallax 25
22% 27.5 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 26.7
Splatting 34.8
27% 33.2 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDPL2TB-D8 2TB
504GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN163
SusWrite @10s intervals: 563 424 426 415 429 560 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 1,329
Write 1,160
Mixed 906
SusWrite 469
216% 966 MB/s
4K Read 51.5
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 68.8
222% 75.6 MB/s
DQ Read 854
DQ Write 706
DQ Mixed 770
579% 777 MB/s
Poor: 166%
This bench: 186%
Great: 382%
ST12000NM0008-2H3101 12TB
7TB free
Firmware: SN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 208 207 212 211 209 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 222
Write 218
Mixed 122
SusWrite 209
43% 193 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 14.1
4K Mixed 1.4
51% 14.4 MB/s
DQ Read 4.1
DQ Write 5.2
DQ Mixed 1.5
2% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 41%
ST12000NM0008-2H3101 12TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: SN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 205 207 208 210 208 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 213
Write 208
Mixed 102
SusWrite 206
41% 182 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 13.6
4K Mixed 1.4
50% 14.1 MB/s
DQ Read 3.9
DQ Write 4.6
DQ Mixed 1.6
2% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 41%
Crucial MX300 750GB-$160
82GB free
Firmware: M0CR070
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 271 257 232 229 212 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 413
Write 473
Mixed 379
SusWrite 236
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 97.9
4K Mixed 39.9
143% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 344
257% 341 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 104%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78
1.5TB free
Firmware: FS2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 141 144 143 144 146 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 140
Write 125
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 144
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
272% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
60.8% Good
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 19
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 20
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M-PLUS Builds (Compare 972 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-PLUS - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $390
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback