Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190801
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateAug 05 '20 at 07:49
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 75.7
1-Core 123
2-Core 246
81% 148 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 817
79% 650 Pts
64-Core 1289
80% 1289 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Lighting 65.1
Reflection 65.7
Parallax 78.9
53% 69.9 fps
MRender 65.2
Gravity 61.9
Splatting 55.2
49% 60.8 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team TM8PS7256G 256GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0712B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 48 17 51 15 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 454
Write 242
Mixed 30.5
SusWrite 43.5
42% 192 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 18.2
4K Mixed 1.6
49% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 4.2
DQ Mixed 27.1
31% 57.9 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 100%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
465GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 433 437 437 439 363 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 437
Mixed 414
SusWrite 424
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 74
4K Mixed 48.8
161% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
150% 202 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 105%
Great: 129%
WDC WD20EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 163 167 165 167 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 201
Write 172
Mixed 91.8
SusWrite 166
35% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 8.4
4K Mixed 0.8
7% 3.37 MB/s
DQ Read 0.9
DQ Write 11.1
DQ Mixed 1.4
2% 4.47 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$36
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.5% Very good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 26.1
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 22.2
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 88.9
45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,808 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $932
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback