HP Z240 Tower Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics39.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive187% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z240 Tower Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 802F
Memory35.8 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181204
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateAug 12 '20 at 12:45
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v6
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 76.7
1-Core 113
2-Core 204
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 585
61% 490 Pts
64-Core 578
36% 578 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 75%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2000
HP(103C 11B3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1721 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 391.74
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.9% Below average
Lighting 47.5
Reflection 55.5
Parallax 44.4
39% 49.1 fps
MRender 48.8
Gravity 47.7
Splatting 56.3
42% 50.9 fps
Poor: 38%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 42%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXZ73H0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 834 754 744 749 804 774 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 1,500
Write 1,024
Mixed 490
SusWrite 776
210% 948 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 88.7
4K Mixed 48.8
164% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 694
DQ Write 572
DQ Mixed 691
502% 652 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 187%
Great: 292%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66
298GB free
Firmware: M3CR010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 374 390 401 389 375 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 454
Write 393
Mixed 376
SusWrite 378
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 72.3
4K Mixed 40.1
133% 47 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 296
236% 331 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 125%
Kingston HyperX 240GB-$65
166GB free
Firmware: 501ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 204 208 215 200 204 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
74% Very good
Read 338
Write 250
Mixed 256
SusWrite 206
59% 263 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 71.1
4K Mixed 31.7
116% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 297
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 241
190% 265 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74%
Great: 92%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
15GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.2 7.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
3.17% Terrible
Read 7.3
Write 5.5
Mixed 7.2
SusWrite 7.4
9% 6.85 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.17%
Great: 8%
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB
84GB free, PID 0570
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 55 54 55 55 55 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
24.4% Poor
Read 53
Write 61.5
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 55
72% 52.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391A1K43BB1-CRC M378A2K43BB1-CPB M391A1K43BB1-CRC M378A2K43BB1-CPB 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.7% Good
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 21.5
67% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 18.5
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z240 Tower Workstation Builds (Compare 3,182 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z240 Tower Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $180
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback