Performance Results


Gaming 104% UFO	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 94% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	231% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Schenkertechnologiesgmbh XMG NEO (M19, RTX 2080) (all builds)
Motherboard	SchenkerTechnologiesGmbH XMG_GK7CQ8S_M19
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190918
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Aug 19 '20 at 03:27
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	95.1% Outstanding	Memory 93.5 1-Core 136 2-Core 272 93% 167 Pts	4-Core 520 8-Core 828 83% 674 Pts	64-Core 1,041 64% 1,041 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 95.1% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080 (Mobile Max-Q) 7,789 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Device(1D05 1069) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5206 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Lighting 139 Reflection 144 Parallax 146 114% 143 fps	MRender 154 Gravity 117 Splatting 100 98% 124 fps
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 102%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 412GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 995 1131 871 818 824 823 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	231% Outstanding	Read 919 Write 1,111 Mixed 672 SusWrite 910 204% 903 MB/s	4K Read 59.8 4K Write 130 4K Mixed 80.7 263% 90 MB/s	DQ Read 1,402 DQ Write 1161 DQ Mixed 1,268 954% 1,277 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 231% Great: 355%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 464GB free Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1231 1186 797 804 802 938 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	247% Outstanding	Read 935 Write 838 Mixed 706 SusWrite 959 194% 860 MB/s	4K Read 65.1 4K Write 141 4K Mixed 86.3 284% 97.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1543 DQ Write 1,293 DQ Mixed 1,348 1,029% 1,395 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 247% Great: 355%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 411GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 266 454 456 458 462 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	81.5% Excellent	Read 390 Write 387 Mixed 294 SusWrite 413 84% 371 MB/s	4K Read 9.6 4K Write 87.1 4K Mixed 18.7 85% 38.5 MB/s	DQ Read 369 DQ Write 317 DQ Mixed 337 254% 341 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CM4X8GF2666C18S2 2x8GB 2,035 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	81.2% Excellent	MC Read 32.5 MC Write 30 MC Mixed 22.6 81% 28.4 GB/s	SC Read 19.3 SC Write 32 SC Mixed 26.4 74% 25.9 GB/s	Latency 61.1 66% 61.1 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 87%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 71%

Battleship

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 62%

Destroyer

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	2x

GPU
RTX 2080 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 90%, 7,789 samples	2x

SSD
FireCuda 510 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSeagateBench 233%, 3,035 samples	1x
Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001 1TBNvmeBench 217%, 23 samples	1x

RAM
9905712-035.A00G 2x16GBKingstonBench 83%, 321 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16