Lenovo 7519B3U

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 7519B3U  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121016
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 22 '20 at 12:23
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2130-$50
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
48.3% Average
Memory 72.4
1-Core 67.1
2-Core 102
51% 80.4 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 155
19% 148 Pts
64-Core 152
9% 152 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3078) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.95% Terrible
Lighting 1.03
Reflection 1.15
Parallax 0.94
1% 1.04 fps
MRender 1.43
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 1.91
1% 1.37 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.95%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 60 84 100 83 63 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 117
Write 111
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 75.8
69% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMT3020EartNumber1 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.8% Poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 7
19% 6.73 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 5.5
15% 5.3 GB/s
Latency 95.8
42% 95.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback