Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3220-$79 71,790 User benchmarks, average bench 52% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	59.4% Above average	Memory 82.2 1-Core 89.6 2-Core 149 65% 107 Pts	4-Core 213 8-Core 221 29% 217 Pts	64-Core 220 14% 220 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620 17,163 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 8418) 1GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 325 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.43 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	2.88% Terrible	Lighting 3.73 Reflection 4.15 Parallax 3.31 3% 3.73 fps	MRender 3.14 Gravity 4.07 Splatting 2.48 3% 3.23 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.88% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100 67,541 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 187GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR070 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 3,932 Write 3,279 Mixed 3,216 774% 3,476 MB/s	4K Read 276 4K Write 184 4K Mixed 225 804% 228 MB/s	DQ Read 657 DQ Write 338 DQ Mixed 493 367% 496 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 2x4GB 6,486 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	50% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 16.3 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 16.1 SC Mixed 15.8 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 76.6 52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16