PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 1.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Toshiba Satellite A300 (all builds) |
Motherboard | TOSHIBA Portable PC |
Memory | 0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20081124 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 26 '20 at 13:50 |
Run Duration | 154 Seconds |
Run User | GRC-User |
Background CPU | 12% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Duo T6600
CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
|
33.4%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400
Toshiba(1179 FF1E) 256MB
Driver: atidxx32 Ver. 8.479.0.0
|
1.03%
Terrible
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
384GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GR2OA230
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 52 51 28 54 45 MB/s
|
29.2%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2
|
12.4%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Duo T6400Intel $99Bench 34%, 4,995 samples | 19x |
Core2 Duo T8300Intel $27Bench 37%, 2,604 samples | 9x |
Core2 Duo T6500IntelBench 34%, 3,335 samples | 7x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Mobility Radeon HD 3400ATIBench 1%, 7,025 samples | 44x |
Mobility Radeon HD 3650ATIBench 2%, 3,003 samples | 33x |
Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 23,924 samples | 13x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 39% - Below average | Total price: $128 |