Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4-IB

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	70.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	146% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4-IB (all builds)
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181029
Uptime	4.3 Days
Run Date	Aug 29 '20 at 07:35
Run Duration	214 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	22%

Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	36.7% Below average	Memory 53.8 1-Core 48.6 2-Core 68.3 37% 56.9 Pts	4-Core 108 8-Core 148 16% 128 Pts	64-Core 210 13% 210 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 8674) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	70.3% Very good	Lighting 62.6 Reflection 76 Parallax 148 51% 95.5 fps	MRender 170 Gravity 134 Splatting 104 108% 136 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB 4,056 User benchmarks, average bench 250% 143GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 956 751 556 540 550 532 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	146% Outstanding	Read 1,335 Write 1,295 Mixed 536 SusWrite 647 213% 953 MB/s	4K Read 33.4 4K Write 60.4 4K Mixed 40.9 135% 44.9 MB/s	DQ Read 276 DQ Write 231 DQ Mixed 270 198% 259 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 146% Great: 331%
WDC WDS100T2G0A-00JH30 1TB 17,953 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 854GB free Firmware: UH510000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 82 128 29 77 56 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	38.4% Below average	Read 414 Write 279 Mixed 264 SusWrite 88.4 58% 262 MB/s	4K Read 12.4 4K Write 25.6 4K Mixed 7.3 42% 15.1 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 75.3 DQ Mixed 24.5 38% 72.7 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 106%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1.5TB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 39 38 39 39 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	22.2% Poor	Read 36.7 Write 36.5 Mixed 30.5 SusWrite 38.3 48% 35.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.9 125% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 44%
WD 15EADS External 1.5TB 1,396 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 429GB free, PID 1003 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 40 41 41 41 42 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	17.3% Very poor	Read 38.8 Write 33.7 Mixed 30.5 SusWrite 40.4 48% 35.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.6 52% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 21%
WD 15EADS External 1.5TB 1,396 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 32GB free, PID 1003 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 38 38 39 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	17.1% Very poor	Read 37.7 Write 30.5 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 37.4 44% 32.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 21%
Hitachi HDS723030ALA640 3TB 62 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 983GB free, PID 1011 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 39 41 40 41 42 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	19.4% Very poor	Read 40 Write 41.5 Mixed 36.3 SusWrite 40.4 54% 39.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 82% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR4 2666 2OZ 2x8GB 6,330 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	44.2% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 17.7 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 7.6 SC Write 12.5 SC Mixed 11.5 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 147 27% 147 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z390 Phantom Gaming 4-IB Builds (Compare 1,761 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 100%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 92%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4-IB

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	742x
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	656x
Core i9-9900KIntel $412Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	233x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	593x
RTX 2080Nvidia $407Bench 124%, 316,424 samples	566x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	99x

SSD
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	184x
Ultimate SU800 1TBAdata $112Bench 104%, 26,139 samples	124x
SU650 240GBAdata $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples	80x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	181x
78.C1GS7.AUW0B 2x8GBUnknownBench 77%, 3,890 samples	167x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 81%, 16,423 samples	129x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $494

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4-IB

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4-IB

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)