Asrock A75M-HVS

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock A75M-HVS (all builds)
Memory	0.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121119
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 28 '17 at 15:05
Run Duration	198 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	31%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-3820 APU 1,243 User benchmarks, average bench 44% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	37.9% Below average	Memory 56.7 1-Core 34.9 2-Core 69.3 35% 53.6 Pts	4-Core 112 8-Core 119 15% 116 Pts	64-Core 132 8% 132 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6550D 4,197 User benchmarks, average bench 4% ASRock(1849 9640) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.301.1001.0 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	1.94% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 3.5 Parallax 4 2% 3.27 fps	MRender 1.67 Gravity 3.53 Splatting 2.39 2% 2.53 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.94% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Crucial MX100 128GB-$74 9,892 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 9080 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1005 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 89 89 332 (AE) Unknown 100 100 52 (B4) Unknown 0 0 1036 (B7) Unknown 100 100 1 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 68 49 219044118560 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 16 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 64153 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 89 89 11 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 15714504259 (F7) Unknown 100 100 494540649 (F8) Unknown 100 100 2570211503	37% Below average	Read 497 Write 113 Mixed 187 58% 266 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 1.58 4K Mixed 1.46 38% 8.79 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 89%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 259GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 179 178 6008 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 223 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1390 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 222 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 19 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 6861 (C2) HDA temperature 115 102 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	41.6% Average	Read 66.3 Write 78.9 Mixed 14.2 39% 53.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 0.35 4K Mixed 0.14 39% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 63%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 45GB free Firmware: 05.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 171 167 4433 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2212 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 59 59 30620 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1752 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 533 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1678 (C2) HDA temperature 107 96 40 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 32 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	45% Average	Read 70.4 Write 86.5 Mixed 66.7 56% 74.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.28 4K Write 1.45 4K Mixed 0.34 76% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5474-023.A00LF 99U5471-056.A00LF 12GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	15.4% Very poor	MC Read 6.9 MC Write 5.8 MC Mixed 4.9 17% 5.87 GB/s	SC Read 0 SC Write 0.1 SC Mixed 0 0% 0.03 GB/s	Latency 138 29% 138 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A75M-HVS Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock A75M-HVS - $238

CPU
A8-3850 APUAMD $80Bench 46%, 3,108 samples	18x
Athlon II X4 641AMDBench 48%, 1,109 samples	10x
Athlon II X4 651AMDBench 50%, 1,008 samples	8x

GPU
Radeon HD 6410DAMDBench 2%, 3,128 samples	8x
HD 7750AMDBench 8%, 22,655 samples	5x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	5x

SSD
SU650 480GBAdata $89Bench 69%, 17,796 samples	8x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	2x

RAM
Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBCorsairBench 50%, 20,728 samples	6x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	2x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 39% - Below average

Total price: $407

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16