Gigabyte GA-880GM-UD2H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-880GM-UD2H (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120507
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 02 '20 at 03:41
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 840-$150 5,147 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	43.8% Average	Memory 55.2 1-Core 47.6 2-Core 94.5 40% 65.8 Pts	4-Core 188 8-Core 189 25% 189 Pts	64-Core 188 12% 188 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 55%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
ATI Radeon HD 4250 5,806 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	0.57% Terrible	Lighting 0.67 Reflection 1.27 Parallax 0.44 0% 0.79 fps	MRender 0.86 Gravity 0.13 Splatting 1.13 1% 0.71 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.57% Great: 1%
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% EVGA(3842 2615) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.76% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 2.73 Parallax 0.59 2% 1.84 fps	MRender 2.33 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 1.78 2% 2.12 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.76% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 92 118 108 77 57 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	59.7% Above average	Read 123 Write 110 Mixed 28.1 SusWrite 85.2 63% 86.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 103%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 468GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 125 126 128 130 127 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	78.7% Very good	Read 147 Write 149 Mixed 24.6 SusWrite 127 81% 112 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	20.8% Poor	MC Read 8.1 MC Write 6.2 MC Mixed 6.5 20% 6.93 GB/s	SC Read 6.8 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 6.1 18% 6.47 GB/s	Latency 143 28% 143 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-880GM-UD2H Builds (Compare 168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-880GM-UD2H

CPU
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	24x
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	23x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	18x

GPU
Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 5,806 samples	24x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	10x
GTX 650-TiNvidia $152Bench 14%, 36,698 samples	8x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	6x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	5x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	29x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	28x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $203

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16