Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD V120 586 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Socket S1G4, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	35.6% Below average	Memory 66.3 1-Core 32.4 2-Core 22.4 32% 40.4 Pts	4-Core 31.6 8-Core 32.6 4% 32.1 Pts	64-Core 32.1 2% 32.1 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250 11,054 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 036E) 256MB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	0.55% Terrible	Lighting 0.63 Reflection 1.08 Parallax 0.12 0% 0.61 fps	MRender 0.81 Gravity 0.07 Splatting 1.22 1% 0.7 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.55% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$36 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF510000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 75 21 21 27 67 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.8% Poor	Read 203 Write 139 Mixed 152 SusWrite 54.1 31% 137 MB/s	4K Read 11.6 4K Write 21.6 4K Mixed 12.6 45% 15.3 MB/s	DQ Read 82.6 DQ Write 71.7 DQ Mixed 41.4 41% 65.2 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown FSFE85F-C8KL9 N3S02F1333 4GB 1066, 1066 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	8.78% Terrible	MC Read 2.2 MC Write 3.4 MC Mixed 1.5 7% 2.37 GB/s	SC Read 1.2 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 1 4% 1.53 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 26%

Raft

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

CPU
V120AMDBench 33%, 586 samples	10x
Phenom II N620 Dual-CoreAMDBench 42%, 297 samples	2x
Phenom II N660AMD $89Bench 42%, 385 samples	1x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 11,054 samples	13x

SSD
LCS-128M6S 2.5 128GBLiteonitBench 78%, 3,907 samples	1x
CS1311 240GBPNY $78Bench 81%, 26,547 samples	1x
SSD370 64GBTranscend $39Bench 55%, 408 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5673FH0-CH9 M471B2873EH1-CF8 3GBSamsungBench 18%, 5 samples	2x
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 40%, 8,137 samples	1x
HMT351S6BFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 28%, 30 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16