Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	10.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 540 8,329 User benchmarks, average bench 41% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	32.4% Below average	Memory 49.9 1-Core 51.8 2-Core 91.2 39% 64.3 Pts	4-Core 82.1 8-Core 125 13% 103 Pts	64-Core 133 8% 133 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 5100M 1,931 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 1521) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.92 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	2.46% Terrible	Lighting 2.83 Reflection 4.27 Parallax 1.03 2% 2.71 fps	MRender 4.86 Gravity 2.13 Splatting 3.26 3% 3.42 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.46% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$32 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 61 51 25 63 77 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	10.2% Very poor	Read 71 Write 57 Mixed 33.2 SusWrite 50.1 12% 52.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.2 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 3.9 14% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	15.4% Very poor	MC Read 5.5 MC Write 6.1 MC Mixed 5.2 16% 5.6 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 0.4 6% 1.97 GB/s	Latency 161 25% 161 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
NVS 5100MNvidiaBench 2%, 1,931 samples	305x
Quadro FX 880MNvidiaBench 2%, 4,542 samples	3x
Quadro FX 1800MNvidiaBench 3%, 1,209 samples	1x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	7x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	5x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16