Performance Results


Gaming 55% Yacht	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	99.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	79.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX Z370-H GAMING (all builds)
Memory	6.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200225
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Sep 18 '20 at 15:50
Run Duration	177 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	51%

PC Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	55.8% Above average	Memory 59.5 1-Core 116 2-Core 182 67% 119 Pts	4-Core 280 8-Core 493 47% 386 Pts	64-Core 775 48% 775 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% Asus(1043 8728) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	99.5% Outstanding	Lighting 123 Reflection 119 Parallax 138 100% 127 fps	MRender 167 Gravity 113 Splatting 92 98% 124 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 99.5% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB 27,887 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 250GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT24B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 258 265 284 313 301 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	79.1% Very good	Read 368 Write 271 Mixed 257 SusWrite 285 66% 295 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 71.7 4K Mixed 29.2 104% 39.9 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 286 DQ Mixed 278 223% 315 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 133%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 386GB free Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 238 251 277 319 308 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	83.9% Excellent	Read 385 Write 309 Mixed 335 SusWrite 276 73% 326 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 66.1 4K Mixed 33.3 116% 41.7 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 325 DQ Mixed 295 236% 332 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 125%
WD WD20EZAZ-00WGYX0 2TB 9,544 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 165 166 167 167 168 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 101%
WD WD20EZAZ-00WGYX0 2TB 9,544 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 156 156 155 156 158 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GB 22,274 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	26.7% Poor	MC Read 9.5 MC Write 10.9 MC Mixed 8.8 28% 9.73 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 7 SC Mixed 4.8 15% 5.17 GB/s	Latency 129 31% 129 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 103%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 111%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	188x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	184x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	137x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	176x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	127x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	125x

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $927

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16