Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics72.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive333% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory50.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime23.8 Days
Run DateSep 26 '20 at 13:59
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Memory 76.7
1-Core 150
2-Core 298
93% 175 Pts
4-Core 582
8-Core 994
96% 788 Pts
64-Core 1406
87% 1406 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Lighting 96.1
Reflection 85.4
Parallax 75.2
78% 85.6 fps
MRender 69.1
Gravity 78.9
Splatting 77
62% 75 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
354GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1759 1882 1955 1798 1848 1908 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
333% Outstanding
Read 2,548
Write 2,154
Mixed 1,059
SusWrite 1,858
426% 1,905 MB/s
4K Read 56.9
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 69.4
260% 95.4 MB/s
DQ Read 973
DQ Write 760
DQ Mixed 888
659% 874 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 333%
Great: 393%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320
674GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2075 2270 2227 2175 2267 2324 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
357% Outstanding
Read 2,359
Write 2,339
Mixed 1,498
SusWrite 2,223
474% 2,105 MB/s
4K Read 53.5
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 77.3
263% 96 MB/s
DQ Read 1,099
DQ Write 940
DQ Mixed 1019
764% 1,019 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 357%
Great: 425%
WD WD6003FZBX-00K5WB0 6TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 238 245 234 236 242 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 244
Write 239
Mixed 102
SusWrite 238
150% 206 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 7.9
4K Mixed 1.7
406% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 139%
Great: 138%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 64GB
58GB free, PID 4000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 112
Write 80.2
Mixed 82.1
112% 91.6 MB/s
4K Read 8.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 2.5
147% 3.93 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 47%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB
29GB free, PID 4000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 16 17 16 17 17 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 74.9
Write 11
Mixed 13.2
SusWrite 16.1
29% 28.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 2.6
167% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
89.9% Excellent
MC Read 36.6
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 36
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 26.7
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 37.2
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 154%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,769 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $193

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $933
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback