Razer Blade Pro 17 (Fall 2019)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics99.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive198% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade Pro 17 (Fall 2019)  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DA730
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200721
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateOct 05 '20 at 19:27
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 69%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 109
2-Core 200
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 507
53% 426 Pts
64-Core 650
40% 650 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 76%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080 (Mobile Max-Q)
Device(1A58 3001) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.55
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 139
Parallax 126
100% 129 fps
MRender 154
Gravity 116
Splatting 99.9
98% 123 fps
Poor: 73%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HALR-00A00 1TB
741GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7301Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1105 1180 1205 1234 1167 1157 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
198% Outstanding
Read 1,300
Write 1,337
Mixed 829
SusWrite 1,175
261% 1,160 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 63
4K Mixed 41
122% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 870
DQ Write 756
DQ Mixed 803
604% 809 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 198%
Great: 289%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$76
725GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1325 1474 1323 1282 1310 1322 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 1,432
Write 1,353
Mixed 1,034
SusWrite 1,339
290% 1,289 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 77.3
4K Mixed 61.2
172% 57.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,081
DQ Write 922
DQ Mixed 992
746% 998 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 238%
Great: 410%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFD8266.M16FJ 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.4% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 25.6
81% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 20.1
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Pro 17 (Fall 2019) Builds (Compare 162 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

System: Razer Blade Pro 17 (Fall 2019)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback