Asus H97M-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H97M-E  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 11 '20 at 20:29
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690-$52
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Memory 95
1-Core 114
2-Core 232
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 463
8-Core 465
62% 464 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.9.2
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Lighting 65.6
Reflection 70
Parallax 87.1
54% 74.3 fps
MRender 75.7
Gravity 66.7
Splatting 60.3
54% 67.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6185
Write 5,240
Mixed 5,540
1,260% 5,655 MB/s
4K Read 433
4K Write 283
4K Mixed 332
1,230% 349 MB/s
DQ Read 1,128
DQ Write 1,018
DQ Mixed 1,056
797% 1,067 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
68GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 493
Write 289
Mixed 300
80% 361 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 67.4
4K Mixed 25.8
105% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 85.7
DQ Mixed 134
113% 171 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 76%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
845GB free
Firmware: 100.
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 74.2
Write 70.2
Mixed 41.7
46% 62 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 57%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
5GB free
Firmware: CC24
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 123
Write 97.7
Mixed 81
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90
289GB free
Firmware: 100.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 53 55 55 55 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
46% Average
Read 105
Write 101
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 54.8
58% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46%
Great: 58%
Maxtor STM3250820A 250GB
30GB free
Firmware: .3AA
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 49.5
Write 24.3
Mixed 32
26% 35.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
63.2% Good
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 20
62% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 19.8
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 57.1
70% 57.1 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M-E Builds (Compare 2,533 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-E - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $277
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback