Asus X99-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics78.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus X99-E  (all builds)
Memory17.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161108
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateOct 11 '20 at 22:23
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-6800K-$435
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 84.3
1-Core 118
2-Core 227
83% 143 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 664
68% 537 Pts
64-Core 845
57% 845 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$400
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.7% Very good
Lighting 101
Reflection 111
Parallax 104
81% 105 fps
MRender 96.6
Gravity 93
Splatting 97.4
76% 95.7 fps
Poor: 72%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 88%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
512GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 436 450 451 447 457 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 467
Mixed 318
SusWrite 443
97% 430 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 76.3
4K Mixed 36.4
133% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 285
230% 326 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 103%
Great: 134%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$155
535GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2034 2046 1236 1153 1146 1142 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
276% Outstanding
Read 2,247
Write 2,008
Mixed 1,652
SusWrite 1,460
413% 1,842 MB/s
4K Read 54.3
4K Write 95.7
4K Mixed 69.1
222% 73 MB/s
DQ Read 813
DQ Write 448
DQ Mixed 658
482% 640 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 276%
Great: 359%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$100
69GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 44 46 54 54 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 52.3
Write 48.4
Mixed 35.4
SusWrite 48.8
34% 46.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 67%
WD My Book 1140 1TB
730GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 112 114 113 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 117
Write 113
Mixed 86.4
SusWrite 113
145% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
102% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 48%
WD My Passport 0820 2TB
2TB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 42 42 42 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 39.3
Write 38.4
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 41.3
47% 34.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 44.7
MC Mixed 34.9
111% 38.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 19
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X99-E Builds (Compare 674 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $1,095
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $390Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback