Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	60.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	348% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	12.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170407
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 18 '20 at 13:53
Run Duration	233 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	77.9% Very good	Memory 70.7 1-Core 121 2-Core 243 79% 145 Pts	4-Core 455 8-Core 875 79% 665 Pts	64-Core 1,243 77% 1,243 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 77.9% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549 37,353 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Asus(1043 046C) CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.9.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	60.4% Good	Lighting 75.7 Reflection 61.4 Parallax 89.8 62% 75.6 fps	MRender 62.3 Gravity 65.7 Splatting 80.3 58% 69.4 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 55%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$98 276,089 User benchmarks, average bench 394% 896GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2255 2293 2300 2319 2323 1747 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	348% Outstanding	Read 2,382 Write 2,382 Mixed 2296 SusWrite 2,206 523% 2,317 MB/s	4K Read 67.5 4K Write 121 4K Mixed 84.3 274% 90.8 MB/s	DQ Read 865 DQ Write 614 DQ Mixed 804 583% 761 MB/s
Poor: 274% ↑ This bench: 348% Great: 488%
Amd-raid Array 3 499GB 95 User benchmarks, average bench 146% 178GB free Firmware: 9.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 734 328 306 299 288 282 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	123% Outstanding	Read 860 Write 984 Mixed 618 SusWrite 373 159% 709 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 39.6 147% 57.2 MB/s	DQ Read 270 DQ Write 673 DQ Mixed 295 276% 412 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 288%
Amd-raid SAMSUNG HD103UJ 1TB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 87GB free Firmware: 1AA0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 45 50 47 46 45 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	28% Poor	Read 50.7 Write 59.2 Mixed 37 SusWrite 46.4 36% 48.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 62%
Amd-raid SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 612GB free Firmware: 1AG0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 67 67 67 67 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	42.8% Average	Read 82.6 Write 87.5 Mixed 42.2 SusWrite 66.5 51% 69.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 124% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 56%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 10GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 6.8 6.8 6.4 6.2 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	22.2% Poor	Read 121 Write 6.5 Mixed 11.2 SusWrite 6.9 30% 36.4 MB/s	4K Read 10.6 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.4 60% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB 92,468 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37.7% Below average	MC Read 13.7 MC Write 12.2 MC Mixed 11.1 35% 12.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 12.5 42% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 99.7 40% 99.7 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	100x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $1,042

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)