Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	59% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4-IB (all builds)
Memory	10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190326
Uptime	6.4 Days
Run Date	Oct 21 '20 at 04:38
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	46.4% Average	Memory 57.6 1-Core 25.5 2-Core 53 31% 45.4 Pts	4-Core 188 8-Core 589 42% 388 Pts	64-Core 1,131 70% 1,131 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% MSI(1462 3734) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	59% Above average	Lighting 57.9 Reflection 72.3 Parallax 111 47% 80.4 fps	MRender 107 Gravity 112 Splatting 86.4 82% 102 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70 47,016 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 119GB free (System drive) Firmware: V8X01c62 SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 187 222 184 137 41 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	43% Average	Read 281 Write 304 Mixed 287 SusWrite 167 58% 260 MB/s	4K Read 11.7 4K Write 19.9 4K Mixed 14.5 47% 15.4 MB/s	DQ Read 88.2 DQ Write 221 DQ Mixed 67.5 76% 126 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 99%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 421GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 747 841 893 781 788 765 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	138% Outstanding	Read 1,187 Write 1,153 Mixed 1,062 SusWrite 802 236% 1,051 MB/s	4K Read 22.6 4K Write 34 4K Mixed 21.7 80% 26.1 MB/s	DQ Read 317 DQ Write 445 DQ Mixed 955 561% 572 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 138% Great: 355%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 931GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 150 159 159 160 160 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	92.4% Outstanding	Read 168 Write 133 Mixed 71.5 SusWrite 155 96% 132 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 92.4% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB 122,822 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	51.8% Above average	MC Read 18.6 MC Write 19.9 MC Mixed 22.6 58% 20.4 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 8.6 SC Mixed 8.4 22% 7.87 GB/s	Latency 135 30% 135 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 90%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 100%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 92%

Nuclear submarine

SSD
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	184x
Ultimate SU800 1TBAdata $112Bench 104%, 26,139 samples	124x
SU650 240GBAdata $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples	80x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	184x
78.C1GS7.AUW0B 2x8GBUnknownBench 77%, 3,890 samples	169x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 81%, 16,423 samples	129x

Value: 103% - Outstanding

Total price: $487

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16