Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120917
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateApr 20 '17 at 16:08
Run Duration588 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4300-$73
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 89.9
1-Core 70.4
2-Core 124
60% 94.9 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 220
29% 218 Pts
64-Core 217
13% 217 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Gainward(10B0 1184) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 372.70
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
34.6% Below average
Lighting 41.8
Reflection 37.5
Parallax 49.8
34% 43 fps
MRender 52.7
Gravity 47.2
Splatting 34.6
36% 44.9 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier Pro SP900 128GB-$40
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.0. Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.4% Below average
Read 254
Write 89
Mixed 122
34% 155 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 61
4K Mixed 6.67
64% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 14.2
41% 88.3 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 80%
Xlr8_pl0 60AB 60GB
30GB free
Firmware: 320A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.3% Below average
Read 118
Write 67.7
Mixed 101
21% 95.6 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 61.4
4K Mixed 13.2
84% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 63
DQ Mixed 23
36% 69.7 MB/s
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
195GB free
Firmware: 05.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 117
Write 98.1
Mixed 105
80% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 1.33
4K Mixed 0.36
92% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
25GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 127
Write 88.7
Mixed 85.3
75% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.04
4K Write 2.41
4K Mixed 0.34
126% 1.26 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 109%
USB 2.0 Flash 2GB
1GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
4.75% Terrible
Read 17.7
Write 3.93
Mixed 6.27
9% 9.31 MB/s
4K Read 5.28
4K Write 0.03
4K Mixed 0.03
21% 1.78 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.75%
Great: 6%
Generic Flash Disk 1GB
0GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
4.27% Terrible
Read 12.5
Write 5.68
Mixed 7.58
10% 8.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.68
4K Write 0.11
4K Mixed 0.11
21% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.27%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT4G3D1869DT1TX0. 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.1% Below average
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 9.3
28% 9.67 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 8.7
23% 8.13 GB/s
Latency 67.3
59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,814 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $358
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback