Asus H110M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive23.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H110M-A  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 25 '20 at 18:28
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$40
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 117
2-Core 198
75% 131 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 318
42% 314 Pts
64-Core 321
20% 321 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.7990
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.42% Terrible
Lighting 6.57
Reflection 9.42
Parallax 6.75
5% 7.58 fps
MRender 9.67
Gravity 5.97
Splatting 14
8% 9.89 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.42%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
294GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1C2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 43 58 22 40 58 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.4% Poor
Read 165
Write 98.3
Mixed 83.9
SusWrite 60.9
23% 102 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 17.6
4K Mixed 9.4
41% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 15
DQ Write 16.1
DQ Mixed 14.7
11% 15.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 102%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 136 136 136 130 139 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 98.4
Write 105
Mixed 93.4
SusWrite 135
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.7
274% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 92%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 16GB
12GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 6.6 6.2 6.4 7.3 6.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
6.46% Terrible
Read 20.6
Write 12
Mixed 13.2
SusWrite 6.5
16% 13.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 1.1
64% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.46%
Great: 13%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB
5GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 11 13 13 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
8.44% Terrible
Read 34.3
Write 12.2
Mixed 17.9
SusWrite 12
23% 19.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.5
29% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.44%
Great: 37%
CBM Flash Disk 1GB
1GB free, PID 6025
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.5 2.5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
4.38% Terrible
Read 16
Write 2
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 2.4
6% 6.15 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
28% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.38%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
75.2% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 25.1
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 24.3
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-A Builds (Compare 1,069 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H110M-A - $76

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 30% - Below average Total price: $542
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback