Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime8.3 Days
Run DateOct 26 '20 at 19:30
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
85% Excellent
Memory 79.3
1-Core 129
2-Core 241
83% 150 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 887
82% 687 Pts
64-Core 1,282
79% 1,282 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 85%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$233
PNY(196E 1348) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
16% Very poor
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 84.1
Parallax 0.06
0% 28.1 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 78.6
Splatting 0.09
47% 66.1 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 16%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SB8U-128G-1006 128GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4120006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 78 54 55 68 29 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 467
Write 258
Mixed 223
SusWrite 63.8
56% 253 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 47.2
4K Mixed 30.7
104% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 183
159% 240 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
142GB free
Firmware: HPH4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 168 159 163 172 163 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 28.2
Write 55.7
Mixed 33.2
SusWrite 166
52% 70.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
80% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 112%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
184GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 90 89 86 91 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 92.2
Write 84.2
Mixed 51.5
SusWrite 90.6
58% 79.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT8G4D30AET4K.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80.6% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 27.7
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 22.8
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,384 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $480
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback