Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2620 0-$77 3,540 User benchmarks, average bench 58% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	58.5% Above average	Memory 79.9 1-Core 53.1 2-Core 97.9 50% 77 Pts	4-Core 202 8-Core 315 32% 259 Pts	64-Core 455 28% 455 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79 79,894 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Sapphire(1DA2 E367) 2GB CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.8.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	17.3% Very poor	Lighting 19.2 Reflection 26.6 Parallax 23.6 16% 23.1 fps	MRender 26.3 Gravity 16.9 Splatting 30.2 20% 24.5 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 16%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14 42,288 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1206A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 383 413 154 121 56 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	55.9% Above average	Read 366 Write 408 Mixed 248 SusWrite 228 70% 313 MB/s	4K Read 14.6 4K Write 44.7 4K Mixed 16.9 68% 25.4 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 36.7 61% 114 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1x8GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 8 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	26% Poor	MC Read 9.4 MC Write 7.8 MC Mixed 8.2 24% 8.47 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 6.2 19% 6.67 GB/s	Latency 80.7 50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 26%

Raft

RAM
HMT151R7BFR4C 4x4GBHynixBench 67%, 393 samples	38x
36JSZF51272PZ 4x4GBMicronBench 66%, 485 samples	27x
M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,683 samples	17x

Value: 39% - Below average

Total price: $198

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16