HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results


Gaming 67% Battle cruiser	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 65% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	97.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	92.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 84FE
Memory	4.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190527
Uptime	5.8 Days
Run Date	Nov 05 '20 at 19:13
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	42%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185 123,820 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	69% Good	Memory 71.1 1-Core 97.8 2-Core 193 68% 121 Pts	4-Core 359 8-Core 612 59% 485 Pts	64-Core 1048 65% 1048 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% HP(103C 8554) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.38 Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	97.1% Outstanding	Lighting 119 Reflection 111 Parallax 118 97% 116 fps	MRender 165 Gravity 113 Splatting 94.4 98% 124 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 97.1% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB 30,266 User benchmarks, average bench 123% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80002C00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 184 184 181 176 175 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	92.5% Outstanding	Read 730 Write 184 Mixed 329 SusWrite 181 78% 356 MB/s	4K Read 28.5 4K Write 69.4 4K Mixed 31.4 120% 43.1 MB/s	DQ Read 489 DQ Write 208 DQ Mixed 264 218% 320 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 92.5% Great: 164%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 176GB free Firmware: MS2OA8L0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 99 100 99 100 100 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	74.8% Very good	Read 162 Write 146 Mixed 37.3 SusWrite 98.9 80% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 1x16GB 8,406 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	38.7% Below average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 10.5 MC Mixed 13.5 38% 13.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 12.2 SC Mixed 11.3 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 98.8 40% 98.8 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 6,054 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 67%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 60%

Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	2,373x
Core i7-9700Intel $260Bench 92%, 79,875 samples	2,004x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	707x

GPU
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	1,322x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	829x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	709x

SSD
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	1,393x
hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBSKBench 123%, 30,266 samples	1,223x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1006 256GBWDCBench 152%, 17,295 samples	291x

RAM
HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 1x16GBKingstonBench 46%, 8,406 samples	1,890x
HP26D4U6D8ME-16X 1x16GBKingstonBench 47%, 4,169 samples	777x
HP26D4U9S8ME-8X 2x8GBKingstonBench 79%, 4,094 samples	451x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 108% - Outstanding

Total price: $343

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16