Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	4.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-4300M APU-$88 2,270 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Socket FS1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	31.2% Below average	Memory 50.5 1-Core 35.4 2-Core 69.4 33% 51.8 Pts	4-Core 71 8-Core 71 10% 71 Pts	64-Core 64.8 4% 64.8 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7420G 1,918 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 17EE) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1301.0 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	4.45% Terrible	Lighting 5.73 Reflection 5.62 Parallax 4.5 5% 5.28 fps	MRender 4.9 Gravity 4 Splatting 5.57 4% 4.82 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 4.45% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42 25,948 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 109 121 127 125 133 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	52.6% Above average	Read 328 Write 143 Mixed 183 SusWrite 122 43% 194 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 41.9 4K Mixed 22.6 80% 27.9 MB/s	DQ Read 189 DQ Write 137 DQ Mixed 158 120% 161 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NS-DI Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 8GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	23.9% Poor	MC Read 11.8 MC Write 4.8 MC Mixed 8.1 24% 8.23 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 8.8 21% 7.27 GB/s	Latency 159 25% 159 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x
SSD Pro 1500 Series 180GBIntel $209Bench 69%, 7,834 samples	1x
120GB 120GBSSDBench 59%, 4,995 samples	1x

RAM
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 27%, 17,632 samples	3x
16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 1x4GBMicronBench 27%, 6,018 samples	3x
M471B5173CB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 2,184 samples	3x

Value: 30% - Poor

Total price: $188

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16