Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	172% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180824
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 13 '20 at 10:48
Run Duration	202 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	57%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$120 142,983 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	57.9% Above average	Memory 54.4 1-Core 101 2-Core 184 62% 113 Pts	4-Core 330 8-Core 495 51% 413 Pts	64-Core 795 49% 795 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Zotac(19DA 7326) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.35% Terrible	Lighting 3.87 Reflection 3.88 Parallax 3.78 3% 3.84 fps	MRender 3.76 Gravity 3.63 Splatting 5.78 4% 4.39 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.35% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 309GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 887 736 732 739 737 713 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	172% Outstanding	Read 1352 Write 1,132 Mixed 978 SusWrite 757 236% 1,055 MB/s	4K Read 32.1 4K Write 56.9 4K Mixed 43 134% 44 MB/s	DQ Read 837 DQ Write 484 DQ Mixed 696 509% 672 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 172% Great: 355%
Crucial M4 64GB-$92 7,336 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 54GB free Firmware: 0309 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 85 81 86 83 73 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	39.6% Below average	Read 307 Write 91.2 Mixed 91.5 SusWrite 82.4 31% 143 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 41.1 4K Mixed 10.1 59% 22.4 MB/s	DQ Read 140 DQ Write 89.6 DQ Mixed 41.1 50% 90.4 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 65%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$129 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 121GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 295 291 292 299 286 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	79% Very good	Read 338 Write 276 Mixed 256 SusWrite 294 65% 291 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 60.4 4K Mixed 27.3 104% 37.3 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 293 237% 336 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 133%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80 75,644 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 282GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 134 135 142 137 132 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	75.7% Very good	Read 127 Write 130 Mixed 85.6 SusWrite 137 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 96%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 4TB 7,970 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 3TB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 122 114 127 115 117 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	70.3% Very good	Read 124 Write 109 Mixed 72.4 SusWrite 119 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 7.2 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 426% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 98%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95 28,095 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 39GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 81 77 74 82 78 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	31% Below average	Read 31.1 Write 41.3 Mixed 33.3 SusWrite 76.9 34% 45.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 102% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$160 110,884 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	40.2% Average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 15.3 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 8.8 20% 7 GB/s	Latency 145 28% 145 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,433 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	395x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $82Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	133x
Ryzen 7 2700AMD $185Bench 74%, 123,820 samples	129x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	105x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	87x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	74x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	45x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	41x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	41x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	51x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	50x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $578

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16