Asus ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	22.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	235% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Q536FD
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190531
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 14 '20 at 03:20
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%
CPU Throttled	90%

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8565U 81,207 User benchmarks, average bench 55% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	82.6% Excellent	Memory 91.3 1-Core 129 2-Core 256 89% 159 Pts	4-Core 399 8-Core 589 62% 494 Pts	64-Core 584 36% 584 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design 1,537 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Asus(1043 1B5E) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5167 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	22.6% Poor	Lighting 27.9 Reflection 24.7 Parallax 28.7 23% 27.1 fps	MRender 34.6 Gravity 28 Splatting 22.3 22% 28.3 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 22.6% Great: 23%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 753GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1025 1115 1119 1162 1179 1231 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	235% Outstanding	Read 527 Write 510 Mixed 551 SusWrite 1,138 155% 682 MB/s	4K Read 66.2 4K Write 165 4K Mixed 92.9 307% 108 MB/s	DQ Read 1,160 DQ Write 1,023 DQ Mixed 1,067 807% 1,084 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 235% Great: 372%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB 398 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 2TB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 427 432 445 449 450 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	123% Outstanding	Read 499 Write 355 Mixed 362 SusWrite 433 92% 412 MB/s	4K Read 44.5 4K Write 99.4 4K Mixed 60 197% 68 MB/s	DQ Read 373 DQ Write 322 DQ Mixed 346 260% 347 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 130%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K44BM0-CRC 2x8GB 6,645 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	77.4% Very good	MC Read 30.3 MC Write 29.6 MC Mixed 21.5 78% 27.1 GB/s	SC Read 19.2 SC Write 30.2 SC Mixed 23.8 70% 24.4 GB/s	Latency 65.3 61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD Builds (Compare 131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD

CPU
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples	131x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	86x
GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 21%, 1,537 samples	45x

SSD
SD9SN8W256G1102 256GBSandiskBench 69%, 3,311 samples	81x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	17x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	5x

RAM
M471A1K44BM0-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 6,645 samples	131x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16