Apple MacBookPro11,4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemApple MacBookPro11,4  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-06F11FD93F0323C5
Memory0.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190722
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateNov 16 '20 at 06:16
Run Duration89 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-4770HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Memory 77.7
1-Core 50.5
2-Core 101
50% 76.5 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 235
28% 210 Pts
64-Core 183
12% 183 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel Iris Pro HD 5200 (V2 Mobile 1.2 GHz)
Apple(106B 0147) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
3.33% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 4.69
Parallax 7.41
4% 5.5 fps
MRender 6.76
Gravity 3.17
Splatting 9.04
3% 6.32 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.33%
Great: 6%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Apple SM0256G PCIe 251GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXZ13A0Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 1,249
Write 284
Mixed 483
146% 672 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 97.9
4K Mixed 40.1
153% 57 MB/s
DQ Read 464
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 336
245% 327 MB/s
Poor: 87% Great: 203%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 0x31364B544631473634485A2D314736453120 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
59.4% Above average
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 23.4
64% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 12.7
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 84.9
47% 84.9 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical MacBookPro11,4 Builds (Compare 131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 64%
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookPro11,4

The Best.
Intel Core i5-11600K $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $245Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $350Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback