Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	3.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (98%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Samsung Samsung DeskTop System (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG Samsung DeskTop System
Memory	2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080130
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Nov 17 '20 at 03:55
Run Duration	183 Seconds
Run User	LKA-User
Background CPU	98%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E6550-$15 11,349 User benchmarks, average bench 37% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	28.3% Poor	Memory 52.4 1-Core 16.5 2-Core 29.6 25% 32.8 Pts	4-Core 26.4 8-Core 28.3 4% 27.3 Pts	64-Core 23.9 2% 23.9 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 530 5,672 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Zotac(19DA 5162) 1GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.42% Terrible	Lighting 4.23 Reflection 4.65 Parallax 1.25 4% 3.38 fps	MRender 5.76 Gravity 3.97 Splatting 3.13 3% 4.29 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.42% Great: 3%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung SP2504C 250GB-$29 14,402 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 131GB free (System drive) Firmware: VT100-50 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete	Read 3.4 Mixed 2.3 2% 2.85 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 11% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 38%
GT-T140 1GB 0GB free, PID 0001 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	Read 14.4 Write 14.2 Mixed 15 19% 14.5 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 24% 0.23 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4GB 42,830 User benchmarks, average bench 26% null MHz 1024, 2048, 1024 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	MC Read 3.8 MC Write 4 MC Mixed 2.2 10% 3.33 GB/s	SC Read 1.8 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 3.3 8% 2.93 GB/s	Latency 152 26% 152 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	243x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	151x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	96x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16