Asus P8H61-I R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8H61-I R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141125
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 20 '20 at 13:48
Run Duration	509 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	59.1% Above average	Memory 70.2 1-Core 88.8 2-Core 175 63% 111 Pts	4-Core 273 8-Core 307 38% 290 Pts	64-Core 293 18% 293 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 71%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15 37,154 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 3GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 233 Write 205 Mixed 216 49% 218 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 47.6 4K Mixed 19.1 81% 29.1 MB/s	DQ Read 171 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 44.2 70% 134 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 86%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 150GB free Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 199 215 211 215 212 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	62.1% Good	Read 234 Write 222 Mixed 198 SusWrite 210 49% 216 MB/s	4K Read 24.1 4K Write 45.4 4K Mixed 30.4 100% 33.3 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 194 DQ Mixed 198 149% 198 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 114%
Hypertec SSD 120GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 112GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 30 30 30 30 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	8.96% Terrible	Read 33.2 Write 29.5 Mixed 30.7 SusWrite 29.7 7% 30.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.7 4K Write 6.7 4K Mixed 5.2 19% 5.87 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 8.96% Great: 41%
Seagate ST33000651AS 3TB-$229 5,029 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 1TB free Firmware: CC44 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 118 125 121 113 113 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	65.9% Good	Read 112 Write 100 Mixed 62.8 SusWrite 117 72% 98.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB 370 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	43% Average	MC Read 15.1 MC Write 16.1 MC Mixed 14.1 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 14 SC Mixed 12.9 36% 12.7 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H61-I R2.0 Builds (Compare 203 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-I R2.0

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	41x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	19x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	17x

GPU
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	13x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	13x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	12x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	9x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
MX500 500GBCrucial $54Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	7x

RAM
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 50%, 27,024 samples	14x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	12x
1866 CL10 Series 2x8GBUnknownBench 54%, 7,244 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $350

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16