Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive247% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateNov 23 '20 at 13:24
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
89% Excellent
Memory 65.4
1-Core 154
2-Core 294
90% 171 Pts
4-Core 601
8-Core 1,175
105% 888 Pts
64-Core 2,162
134% 2,162 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.2% Poor
Lighting 35.3
Reflection 28.1
Parallax 33.4
29% 32.3 fps
MRender 33
Gravity 33.8
Splatting 32.5
27% 33.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$60
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT401.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2362 632 497 500 501 504 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
247% Outstanding
Read 2,284
Write 2,412
Mixed 1,962
SusWrite 833
420% 1,873 MB/s
4K Read 52.1
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 71.4
238% 83.9 MB/s
DQ Read 812
DQ Write 568
DQ Mixed 703
521% 694 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 247%
Great: 390%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
465GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 240 114 101 93 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 499
Write 286
Mixed 324
SusWrite 181
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 78.7
4K Mixed 43
157% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 118
100% 148 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 126%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
46GB free
Firmware: GM4OA5CA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 72 74 71 77 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 75.5
Write 74.2
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 72.5
48% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 51%
Maxtor 6V250F0 251GB
42GB free
Firmware: VA111900
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 59 59 58 58 58 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 64.3
Write 65.6
Mixed 42.3
SusWrite 58.3
42% 57.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.2
120% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.7% Very good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 25.5
79% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 24.8
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,824 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $193

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $933
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback