Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 40% Speed boat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	52.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair V Formula (all builds)
Memory	3.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121017
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 26 '20 at 19:00
Run Duration	164 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8370-$175 34,720 User benchmarks, average bench 62% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.9 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	78.7% Very good	Memory 93.7 1-Core 87.9 2-Core 177 71% 119 Pts	4-Core 345 8-Core 528 54% 437 Pts	64-Core 528 33% 528 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 590-$200 122,060 User benchmarks, average bench 57% PowerColor(148C 2391) CLim: 1625 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.1 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	52.5% Above average	Lighting 65.3 Reflection 69.8 Parallax 111 53% 82.1 fps	MRender 68.2 Gravity 68.9 Splatting 54.2 51% 63.8 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB 46,239 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 463GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR030 SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 328 1.9 40 94 91 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 100%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 128GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 3,904 Write 2635 Mixed 2991 705% 3,177 MB/s	4K Read 221 4K Write 137 4K Mixed 151 602% 170 MB/s	DQ Read 544 DQ Write 390 DQ Mixed 477 354% 471 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 80GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 104 98 96 102 106 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	Read 98.7 Write 118 Mixed 73.5 SusWrite 100 72% 97.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.1 56% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 106%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 491GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 131 144 106 108 106 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	68.2% Good	Read 113 Write 96.2 Mixed 32.8 SusWrite 125 66% 91.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.6 134% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12GB 85,415 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	43% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 13.5 42% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.4 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 13 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 60.4 66% 60.4 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	82x
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples	53x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	29x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	20x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	15x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	13x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	12x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	9x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	170x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	35x
32GBUnknownBench 53%, 5,781 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $680

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16