Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	85.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$164 321,194 User benchmarks, average bench 93% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	87.8% Excellent	Memory 74.2 1-Core 141 2-Core 278 88% 164 Pts	4-Core 545 8-Core 812 84% 678 Pts	64-Core 790 49% 790 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 87.8% Great: 103%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0B-00YS70 1TB 39,874 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 820GB free (System drive) Firmware: 415000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 364 371 380 365 376 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	85.5% Excellent	Read 245 Write 436 Mixed 375 SusWrite 374 81% 357 MB/s	4K Read 28.1 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 45.7 157% 59.6 MB/s	DQ Read 40.8 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 39.7 45% 72.8 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 85.5% Great: 115%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$50 87,344 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	69.2% Good	MC Read 26.2 MC Write 27.9 MC Mixed 21.2 72% 25.1 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 22 SC Mixed 20.7 56% 19.7 GB/s	Latency 92 44% 92 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 120%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 54%

Yacht

GPU
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	350x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	213x
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	199x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	141x
P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBCrucial $74Bench 212%, 171,271 samples	103x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	102x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	196x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 77%, 23,800 samples	162x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	126x

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $444

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16