Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 99% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 75% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	177% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	41.6 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190603
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 28 '20 at 01:43
Run Duration	113 Seconds
Run User	NZL-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	55.9% Above average	Memory 73 1-Core 70.3 2-Core 135 56% 92.8 Pts	4-Core 230 8-Core 212 30% 221 Pts	64-Core 305 19% 305 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,306 158,856 User benchmarks, average bench 210% EVGA(3842 3987) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 456.38 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	177% Outstanding	Lighting 226 Reflection 300 Parallax 370 184% 299 fps	MRender 372 Gravity 274 Splatting 196 220% 281 fps
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 177% Great: 230%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 126GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 619 555 587 618 605 593 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	223% Outstanding	Read 2,293 Write 1,794 Mixed 1,478 SusWrite 596 343% 1,540 MB/s	4K Read 54.9 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 71 230% 77 MB/s	DQ Read 585 DQ Write 454 DQ Mixed 573 414% 537 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 223% Great: 355%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 3x16GB 142 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 3 of 4 slots used 48GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	55.4% Above average	MC Read 21 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 22.3 59% 20.7 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 13.3 34% 11.8 GB/s	Latency 94.7 42% 94.7 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 7,434 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 144%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 132%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	1,848x
Core i9-9900KIntel $412Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	1,476x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	1,384x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	508x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	498x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	440x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	354x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	260x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	221x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	275x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	240x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	182x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $768

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16