Gigabyte GA-G1.Sniper A88X-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	6.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	38.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-G1.Sniper A88X-CF (all builds)
Memory	2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150618
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	May 07 '17 at 23:27
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka) 15,487 User benchmarks, average bench 44% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	53.7% Above average	Memory 75.4 1-Core 63.5 2-Core 106 52% 81.8 Pts	4-Core 192 8-Core 163 24% 178 Pts	64-Core 190 12% 190 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 22,117 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.2.1 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	6.39% Terrible	Lighting 7.63 Reflection 8.69 Parallax 9.62 6% 8.65 fps	MRender 7.9 Gravity 6.73 Splatting 9.43 7% 8.02 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.39% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PU1000064GBATSSD 64GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS.51.00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 8999 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1237 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 247 (AE) Unknown 100 100 86 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 823 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 1180 (F1) Unknown 100 100 11577524794 (F2) Unknown 100 100 12182190799	38.1% Below average	Read 434 Write 198 Mixed 234 63% 289 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 8.31 4K Mixed 4.01 28% 8.26 MB/s	DQ Read 14.1 DQ Write 8.35 DQ Mixed 6.04 6% 9.51 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 44%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40 42,694 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 179GB free Firmware: AX0A4M Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1814 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3928 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 6234 (0A) Spinup retry count 178 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1710 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 40 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 21 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 58292 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 193274249250 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 94 94 2607 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 272 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	51.7% Above average	Read 93.2 Write 87 Mixed 64.9 61% 81.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.25 4K Write 1.22 4K Mixed 0.2 56% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 57%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB 14,997 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 39GB free Firmware: JP2OA41A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 96 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 100 92 (03) Spinup time 115 100 17192845511 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2677 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 140 100 30 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 12062 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1928 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (B9) Unknown 100 100 65535 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 94 71697204 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 58 421789731 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2682 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2682 (C2) HDA temperature 171 150 180389675043 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1	53.1% Above average	Read 91.7 Write 93.5 Mixed 80.8 67% 88.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.16 4K Write 1.26 4K Mixed 0.17 49% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GB 7,567 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	39.5% Below average	MC Read 18 MC Write 8.5 MC Mixed 16.4 41% 14.3 GB/s	SC Read 7.9 SC Write 7.6 SC Mixed 9.4 24% 8.3 GB/s	Latency 89.6 45% 89.6 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-G1.Sniper A88X-CF Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G1.Sniper A88X-CF

CPU
A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)AMD $467Bench 51%, 11,295 samples	14x
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	14x
A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $175Bench 43%, 12,658 samples	12x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	14x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	9x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x

SSD
Fury 120GBHyperX $160Bench 64%, 11,403 samples	5x
P3-512 512GBBench 75%, 2,855 samples	4x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x

RAM
F3 DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 41%, 3,080 samples	5x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 43%, 4,751 samples	4x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 10,715 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 34% - Below average

Total price: $627

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16