MSI MS-124K

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star S12T 3M/S12 3M
Motherboard	MSI MS-124K (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131127
Uptime	3.9 Days
Run Date	May 11 '17 at 17:02
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	55%

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-5000 APU 10,330 User benchmarks, average bench 27% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	11.6% Very poor	Memory 13 1-Core 21.6 2-Core 39.4 14% 24.7 Pts	4-Core 57.9 8-Core 67.3 8% 62.6 Pts	64-Core 72.2 4% 72.2 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8330 8,573 User benchmarks, average bench 2% MSI(1462 10F5) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 16.12.2 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.32% Terrible	Lighting 1.47 Reflection 3.04 Parallax 1.94 1% 2.15 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 1.47 Splatting 2.22 2% 1.86 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.32% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 460A 480GB-$300 523 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 301GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 0 0 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 152 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 169 (AB) Unknown 100 100 161859920 (AE) Unknown 100 100 3 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (D0) Spin buzz 100 100 6 (D2) Unknown 100 100 2 (E0) Load friction 100 100 1 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 1635 (F2) Unknown 100 100 1316 (F9) Unknown 100 100 55815411	61.5% Good	Read 424 Write 388 Mixed 424 92% 412 MB/s	4K Read 16.6 4K Write 29.5 4K Mixed 17.7 64% 21.3 MB/s	DQ Read 19.7 DQ Write 36.8 DQ Mixed 11.8 14% 22.8 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 108%
Plextor PX-128M6M 128GB 527 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 55GB free Firmware: 1.08 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 34 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 168 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (AE) Unknown 100 100 10 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 1831 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 880 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 10 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 228 (F1) Unknown 100 100 6148 (F2) Unknown 100 100 2150	57.5% Above average	Read 440 Write 312 Mixed 381 84% 378 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 28.4 4K Mixed 16 63% 20.9 MB/s	DQ Read 20.6 DQ Write 47.4 DQ Mixed 9.82 14% 25.9 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT102464BF160B.M16 CT102464BF160B.C16 16GB 86 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 800, 800 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	8.41% Terrible	MC Read 3.3 MC Write 2.2 MC Mixed 3.2 8% 2.9 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 1.6 SC Mixed 2.7 6% 2.27 GB/s	Latency 377 11% 377 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 8.41% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MSI MS-124K

Performance Results

PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)