Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FA_X509FA

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	173% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FA_X509FA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X509FA
Memory	4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200326
Uptime	2.9 Days
Run Date	Dec 11 '20 at 16:23
Run Duration	113 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	31%
CPU Throttled	88%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8265U 87,841 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	66.9% Good	Memory 72.1 1-Core 121 2-Core 231 78% 141 Pts	4-Core 342 8-Core 430 50% 386 Pts	64-Core 68.2 4% 68.2 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 178,291 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 1961) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7870 Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	4.51% Terrible	Lighting 5.2 Reflection 2.2 Parallax 5.2 4% 4.2 fps	MRender 6.8 Gravity 4.7 Splatting 6.8 5% 6.1 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.51% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1202 512GB 2,132 User benchmarks, average bench 155% 393GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20200000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 835 697 756 755 755 756 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	173% Outstanding	Read 1,064 Write 1,157 Mixed 972 SusWrite 759 223% 988 MB/s	4K Read 37.2 4K Write 134 4K Mixed 56.9 200% 76.1 MB/s	DQ Read 805 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 83.3 168% 359 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 173% Great: 210%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GB 1,078 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2400, 2667 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	70% Very good	MC Read 26.8 MC Write 26.4 MC Mixed 20.6 70% 24.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 32.6 SC Mixed 23.2 69% 24.1 GB/s	Latency 96.7 41% 96.7 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 71%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FA_X509FA Builds (Compare 244 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FA_X509FA

CPU
Core i5-8265UIntelBench 53%, 87,841 samples	109x
Core i3-8145UIntelBench 53%, 15,431 samples	94x
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples	37x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	240x
UHD Graphics 610IntelBench 2%, 3,878 samples	4x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	35x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1202 512GBWDCBench 155%, 2,132 samples	32x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 141%, 16,774 samples	15x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBMicronBench 57%, 2,923 samples	44x
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 1x4GBMicronBench 33%, 1,799 samples	37x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16